The beneath content material first appeared in Politics.co.uk’s Week-in-Evaluation publication, join free and by no means miss this text.
When Donald Trump claimed victory simply after 7.00 am UK time on the morning of 6 November, he did so not just for himself — however for an array of MAGA movers and shakers who helped propel the previous president to this traditionally unbelievable place.
And first among the many cultural-political cabal to safe Trump’s gratitude was the right-wing billionaire tech industrialist, Elon Musk. “A star is born!”, the president-elect proclaimed, teleprompter usually shunned. “He’s an incredible man”, Trump rambled forth. “We have been sitting collectively tonight, , he spent two weeks in Philadelphia and completely different elements of Pennsylvania campaigning. You already know, he despatched the rocket up two weeks in the past.”
Trump devoted over three minutes of his victory speech to Musk. “We’ve got to guard our geniuses. We don’t have that a lot of them”, the president-elect concluded, lastly.
Anti-assisted dying group bought individuals to cover Christian motives when writing to MPs
Union Fury at Personal Fairness Owned Morrisons Bakery Closure in Wakefield
Solely hours earlier than, addressing the Westminster press gallery’s annual reception, UK prime minister Keir Starmer had seemed ahead to a “lengthy evening trying throughout the water”. “It’s going to be a marathon, not a dash”, Starmer insisted as he urged cupboard colleagues to “tweet responsibly”.
The remark steered Starmer, like most observers, had misinterpret the contours of the race. As Trump hurtled in direction of 270 electoral votes, UK politicos (together with new Tory chief Kemi Badenoch) focussed on how the prime minister would deal with a extra unpredictable and vengeful Trump 2.0.
Subsequent briefing, distributed from deep inside No 10 Downing Avenue, insisted the Starmer administration was solely prepared for, even anticipating, a Republican victory. However Downing Avenue’s pre-election wargaming, nonetheless scrupulous, couldn’t have accounted for Elon Musk’s sudden stardom. Starmer and Musk’s skirmishes have been a prevalent function of the PM’s premiership — a actuality that now appears set to accentuate.
In any case, Trump’s election evening gratitude was nicely focused: the fusion of Musk’s monetary, political and cultural clout had performed a major position in his comeback tour. Musk’s roughly $200 million donation to the Republican’s election effort made him one of many greatest donors ever in a single US presidential marketing campaign cycle. In the meantime, X, the social media platform Musk purchased in 2022 for $44 billion was transformed into one other media appendage of the Republican Get together.
Elon Musk’s X makes ‘good argument’ for limiting hate speech, says former Conservative chairman
In some slender senses, Musk’s energy and goals are acquainted. His struggle on authorities waste, and antipathy for allegedly idle civil servants, displays the worldview of the UK Conservative Get together’s libertarian wing. In mild of DOGE, Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg’s erstwhile position as minister for presidency effectivity appears remarkably forward of its time, (how ironic for the “honourable Member for the 18th century”). In the meantime, the X chief’s plan to recruit “high-IQ small-government revolutionaries” mirrors Dominic Cummings’ induction of “weirdos and misfits with odd abilities” into No 10. Others have drawn parallels between Musk’s media empire and that of Rupert Murdoch’s at his peak.
Musk is sui generis, although, as a result of he does all of it. Musk occupies all areas: cultural, technological, political, monetary — and subsequently an area solely of his personal. In fact, if Starmer is to resolve on a method that would comprise or handle Musk, he should first perceive him. However the tech tycoon’s manifold means make his endgame virtually unattainable to learn. Mix these concerns with Musk’s mercurial method and the extra unknowable his designs seem. (That stated, it’s solely doable that, like several good political populist, Musk reacts to circumstance reasonably than in pursuit of a singular technique.)
***Politics.co.uk is the UK’s main digital-only political web site. Subscribe to our every day publication for all the newest information and evaluation.***
It’s nonetheless price asking: the place does Musk’s unyielding and escalating struggle on Keir Starmer function in his wider weltanschauung? Lampooning the PM, Musk should realise, received’t assist his extra-terrestrial ambitions.
The prime minister had solely been in workplace for weeks when Musk fired his first shot. As Starmer reckoned with the outbreak of far proper riots following the unfold of misinformation (together with on X) concerning the deadly stabbing of three younger women in Southport, Musk intervened. He described arrests as “tousled”, responded “sure” to a publish that claimed Starmer was imprisoning individuals “who commit thought crimes on X”, and predicted the outbreak of “civil struggle”.
A spokesperson for Keir Starmer addressed this latter remark, arguing there was “no justification” for the intervention. However this softest of rebukes solely emboldened the tech tycoon. Buoyed by the eye, Musk attacked Starmer personally solely hours later. “Shouldn’t you be involved about assaults on *all* communities?”, Musk requested acidly, in response to the PM’s condemnation of violence in direction of Muslims.
At this most febrile juncture, after every week of constant assaults on Labour’s “Stalinist” insurance policies, all indicators point out an escalation of hostilities within the Musk-Starmer struggle. And the rancour could possibly be about to imagine a extra mutual footing. In current months, ministers have repeatedly expressed considerations concerning the failure of social media firms, together with X, to take immediate motion towards misinformation.
As rioting escalated in the summertime, Starmer issued a pointed warning to social media firms: “Violent dysfunction was clearly whipped up on-line”, he stated, “That can also be against the law. It’s taking place in your premises, and the regulation should be upheld all over the place.”
Peter Kyle, the know-how secretary, held conferences with TikTok, Meta, Google and X about misinformation and incitement on the time. He stated: “Completely different firms take completely different approaches and I count on platforms to make sure that these in search of to unfold hate on-line are usually not being facilitated and have nowhere to cover.”
And crucially, the On-line Security Act is because of kick in early subsequent 12 months. The laws is geared toward bearing down on the unfold of dangerous content material on social media, with policing overseen by regulator Ofcom. The final authorities did water down the laws to take away a provision to control “authorized however dangerous” content material; however non-compliance with the brand new guidelines might nonetheless lead to fines of as much as 10 per cent of world turnover and even quantity to felony costs being introduced towards executives.
***Politics.co.uk is the UK’s main digital-only political web site. Subscribe to our every day publication for all the newest information and evaluation.***
At this stage, the federal government is anticipated to deal with making certain the On-line Security Act’s provisions are carried out successfully. However a brand new inquiry by the cross-party science, innovation and know-how committee of MPs will, as a part of its broad remit, assess the effectiveness of present and proposed regulation for social media, together with the On-line Security Act. The committee might, in time, advocate the federal government strengthen on-line regulation to sort out hate-galvanising algorithms.
In fact, any makes an attempt to beef up regulation will discover in Musk, the self-declared “free speech absolutist”, a consummate and relentlessly aggressive opponent.
Chi Onwurah: ‘Why I hope Elon Musk accepts my invitation to handle MPs’
The best proof of Musk’s energy, stretching far past his place in Trump’s internal circle, is his capacity to launch — by means of a single retweet or supportive emoji — a fringe conspiracy principle into mainstream conversations. However misinformation doesn’t want Musk’s retweeting thumb to proliferate on social media — X’s algorithms are sometimes sufficient. Simply this week, a provably and wildly false publish that claimed Starmer represented the daddy of Southport suspect Axel Rudakubana in an asylum case went viral on X. The tweet in query continues to be dwell, having amassed 5.3 million views and 27,000 likes.
Starmer, his remarks within the wake of the Southport riots point out, recognises the state of affairs is untenable. However all doable options, together with the total implementation of the On-line Security Act, pose profound geopolitical, reputational and moral quandaries. What is for certain, nonetheless, is that the fraught relationship between the British authorities and the world’s richest man appears set to degrade markedly within the months to return. Certainly, it’s a course of that started this week, Politics.co.uk‘s personal evaluation suggests.
Starmer wants a method then, to journey the crashing waves of misinformation, geopolitical foment and Musk slights that loom on the horizon. And the circle Starmer’s method should sq., in essence, is that this: the prime minister doesn’t have the political capital or cultural clout to pursue a feud with Musk (and that’s earlier than one considers the doable geopolitical implications). However nor can the PM proceed to disregard Musk’s more and more aggressive assaults, that are hardening a view of this authorities as at struggle on all fronts. Nor, in fact, can the federal government ignore the misinformation that plagues social media, usually at his and Britain’s expense.
Starmer is caught as an unwilling participant in a zero sum sport. Maybe his objective, at this stage, needs to be to make sure the Musk feud doesn’t devour the following few weeks or months of his premiership. Maybe, in time, Trump may eject Musk from his internal circle and the geopolitical implications of a deeper feud will reduce. However till then, ministers might conclude that some trolls are too large to disregard.
Josh Self is Editor of Politics.co.uk, observe him on Bluesky right here.
Politics.co.uk is the UK’s main digital-only political web site. Subscribe to our every day publication for all the newest information and evaluation.